Debate: What Does "Plus-Size" Even Mean?

Drop the plus, or embrace it?

A recent firestorm over an Instagram post from online clothing retailer ASOS has revived a debate over the label “plus-size.” In early July, ASOS posted a photo of model and filmmaker Naomi Shimada, referring to her in the caption as being “plus-size,” and sparking a mixed response of praise and criticism. The debate led ASOS to remove the plus-size term from their caption, which further prompted disapproval from other individuals who felt that by backing down, ASOS was excluding plus-size consumers.
The heated discussion paints a picture of the modern state of body positivity and whether common ground on a positive representation of all body shapes is possible. By utilizing the “plus-size” label, the fashion industry creates a binary opposition between the norm and “the other,” enforcing an ideology that “plus size” is the subversive opposition. Does the continual use of this term just reinforce the concept that the average size is dominant over plus size, or does the elimination of the label exclude the plus size community from the fashion industry?

On the other hand, there are certainly those who have embraced the label and deemed it inclusive of all body types. One user’s comment on ASOS’ photo, as highlighted by Business Insider, accused the brand of “seem[ing] ashamed. Instead of hiding away from the term why not embrace it. All bodies are good bodies so don't be scared that this particular body is plus sized!” The comment offers the suggestion that disregarding “plus-size” might actually negate potential acceptance of the body shapes that the category represents.
Both using and excluding labels have their advantages and disadvantages. What becomes trickier is the interpretation of “plus-size” in the eyes of the fashion industry. By now, we’ve all heard about Amy Schumer’s criticism of Glamour magazine – one of the most body-positive mainstream publications around – for putting her in their “plus-size” issue without her informed permission. She went on to say that she didn’t find anything wrong with being “plus-size,” but said that wears a size 6 or 8, and in the United States, “plus-size” is considered a size 16. She added, that "young girls seeing my body type thinking that is plus size," could create a hurtful mindset.
This brings us back to ASOS’ own dilemma with the word. Naomi Shimada is a size UK 16, which translates to a US 10 according to the ASOS size guide. What does this reveal? Schumer’s argument reminds us that the label “plus-size” (for those who are actually a size 16) would not fit into the ideal of the fashion media’s representation of “plus-size,” further excluding those who do not fit a certain body criteria. The term plus-size arguably becomes a marketing buzz word, used to tout a body positive corporate attitude without accurately representing its implications and continuing to cast women below a size 16 to represent them. 

Perhaps the argument isn’t whether “plus-size” is a positive or a derogatory term. It is imperative to emphasize that all different body types should be embraced. Due to the subjectivity of “plus-size” - or any other sizes for that matter - it is impossible to accurately represent a diverse, multifaceted community under one umbrella term. Although the debate is ongoing about how PC the label is, all shapes and sizes are beautiful regardless if they identify as petite, tall, curvy, maternity or plus.

Linh Ngo is a Junior Fashion Features Contributor with Couturesque.  Catch her other articles over here.

1 comment:

  1. It doesn't matter what we decide to call plus-size clothing, the important thing is that fashion starts to recognize us as a valid customer base, and gives us some respect. We don't want the ugly, cheaply made, outdated, poor-fitting clothes that the fashion industry has given us. We have been disrespected for far too long by this implicit message that thin girls deserve the beautifully made clothes, and we deserve ugly moo-moo's. If designers offered some beautifully made, fashionable clothes, who cares what they are called?

    Here is some more food for thought: I think the fashion industry is lazy, and designers are unimaginative and lacking in creativity. Anyone can design clothes that look good on a tall, thin model. You know the saying "she would look good in a potato sack?" Well, how talented is a designer that can only design clothes for a person who would look good no matter what she wears? If designers really want to prove their talent, creativity, and artistry, I think these talents would be better showcased by proving that they can make beautiful clothes for any size or shape. These so called artists are the equivalent of a painter that can only paint the same scene over and over. It isn't very creative, artistic, and it certainly doesn't prove their talent. If fashion is an art, and the human form is the canvas, why choose the same canvas over and over? Why choose the easiest canvas? It's a bit lazy, don't you think?

    On a more positive note, If designers actually embraced diversity of form, think of how much creativity this might actually unlock! It could open up a whole slew of new ideas and designs that no one has thought of yet. How exciting that would be!


What do you think of this article?


I founded Couturesque Magazine when I was 15 years old because like many of my peers, I felt ignored and talked down to by all of the other teen fashion publications out there. I figured that at the end of the day, the people who knew the most about my generation, were the people who belonged to it. The fashion industry is becoming increasingly dependent on the creativity of younger voices who challenge the status quo and make us rethink what we wear and why we wear it. And that is exactly what Couturesque set out to celebrate - authenticity, intelligence, originality, and diversity... in other words, what makes Gen-Z tick. Fast-forward to 2016 and we now have a staff of more than a dozen fashion distruptors contributing to our daily content from all around the globe, 100K+ readers following us from Toronto to New York, to London, Copenhagen, Berlin, Tokyo, and Tel Aviv, and a plethora of big-wig industry fans and collaborators. But what matters to us the most is the responsibility that our publication has to make a positive impact in the lives of those who come across it - we stand against retouching our photoshoots and we stand for sharing the beautiful, individual, complex voices of everyone, especially those who feel marginalized by mainstream fashion media. We hope that you love our site as much as we do and that you take the time to follow us (Facebook / Twitter / Instagram / Pinterest / Tumblr / Snapchat / YouTube) throughout our journey to make fashion accessible to the powerful young adults of today.

Tia Elisabeth Glista
Editor in Chief